Hardy Stevenson Insights
Engaging people to address issues, build consensus and ensure success.
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
← How to Move Your Home Renovation Forward with Municipal Approvals
The Value of the Benefits Blueprint →

Honouring Our Forests and their Precious Values on World Forestry Day

Posted on March 20, 2013 by lesliehetherington

Our forests embody a wide range of values, which provide diverse benefits. Historically, the commercial or market value of natural resources has been easier to identify than the non-market values.

When we make policy decisions affecting our forests’ future, how do we know whether we have adequately accounted for “all” the values attributable to them? Do we know if we have encouraged efficient allocation and use of resources, protected limited resources and effectively promoted conservation?

Forest MFThese questions were a starting point when HSAL was retained by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, several years ago after it passed the Crown Forest Sustainability Act.

Our mandate was to provide extensive background research on the non-commercial value of forests, including a colloquium think-tank of field experts in ethics, accounting, First Nation spirituality and theology. From this data, we provided recommendations that played an essential role informing Ontario forest policy decisions, which were central to the Province’s eco-system and economic health, forestry sector’s viability and our communities’ well-being, particularly in the north.

For instance, we identified the need to look holistically at the forest ecosystem as encompassing primarily natural systems, with economic systems and social systems as component parts. Based on extensive landscape data, we also recommended the need for: accounting and evaluation systems to support forest policy decision-making to be guided by Core Principles to encompass intrinsic values; institutional and structural change to establish a Provincial network to enable local, community-based decision making.

At the onset, a literature review and public consultation identified the following values:

  • Intrinsic Values – the value something has in itself, independent of its value to any other being. For example, if something can be damaged or harmed, it has some value, and this value is independent of, for example, its usefulness to other beings
  • Spiritual Values – the value attached to something by people because of its importance to their spiritual and cultural sense of identity (e.g., special relationship of First Nations people to the land). It would also include our aesthetic response to the forest
  • Ecological Values – the value attached to the importance of maintaining forest biodiversity to ensure overall ecosystem health and human survival
  • Community Values – this value is central to understanding the sense of community identity, community cohesion and the quality of life in many northern forest communities — the northern Ontario ‘sense of cooperation’
  • Existence Value – the value attached to the satisfaction people obtain from an amenity for various reasons other than their expected personal use. In other words, the satisfaction or peace of mind which comes just from knowing that a natural feature, such as a forest, exists independently of our experience or use of it.’

These values set the stage for a much needed broader consideration of their linkages, divergences and place within a full spectrum of forest values. Integral to this was colloquium participants’ belief that “all forest planning must address the need to Avoid Irrecoverable Harm to the forest ecosystem in the short and long term.”

Additional dialogue and research led to development of recommended Core Principles to preserve ecosystem integrity and the following relevant goals:

  1. To sustain the health and integrity of ecosystems as a whole (including human processes, economics and health).
  2. To sustain the biological diversity of our natural heritage.
  3. To sustain the biological productivity of the natural system.
  4. To sustain natural ecological processes.
  5. To promote environmental education so that the people of Ontario will understand these goals.

We also recommended that these principles explicitly acknowledge the importance of, and accord equal status to the following Core Values:

  • The well-being of future generations (the First Nation principle of a seven generation time-line is recommended)
  • The well-being of individuals and local communities
  • The well-being of forests
  • The well-being of the forest economy

Many of the policy decisions initiated by our Precious Values Report still stand. The above Core Principles and Core Values are also as relevant today – World Forestry Day, 2013.

Check our website to learn more about our forestry work experience or how our public consultation, environmental or socio-economic impact assessment expertise can meet your needs.

Colour Leslie 2012 Glasses 200dpiLeslie Hetherington is Communications Director at Hardy Stevenson and Associates Limited. She is an award-winning, Accredited PR Practitioner (APR) and a past president of the Toronto chapter of the  International Association of Business Communicators. Leslie’s  project experience includes integrated communications planning and implementation through traditional and online channels for diverse mandates, from managing reputations to stimulating economic development in Canada’s North. Skills include stakeholder and media relations, social media marketing, website development, event management and copy writing. 

Advertisements

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

About lesliehetherington

Versatile digital content strategist with seasoned B2B and B2C communications experience in multiple sectors. Former adjunct professor and graphic designer. Occasional painter and sporadic performer. Living in Toronto, Canada's hidden paradise: Guildwood.
View all posts by lesliehetherington →
This entry was posted in Communications, Consultation, Management, Planning, Politics, Sustainability and tagged consultation, environment, environmental assessment, forest ecosystem, forestry, government relations, landscape data, policy, public engagement, research, sustainability, world forestry day. Bookmark the permalink.
← How to Move Your Home Renovation Forward with Municipal Approvals
The Value of the Benefits Blueprint →
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,097 other followers

  • Recent Posts

    • Toronto: A Tale of Three Cities at Why Should I Care?
    • Toronto: A Tale Of Three Cities
    • Is the decline of traditional media and substantive news reporting and the rise of news through social media harming our democracy?
    • We Are Scarborough
    • Economic Development in Scarborough
  • What We’re Talking About

    • advocacy
    • book
    • by-laws
    • carbon emissions
    • cities
    • climate
    • communication
    • communications
    • community
    • community relations
    • community resiliency
    • consultation
    • contamination
    • corporations
    • design
    • ecological
    • energy
    • energy sector
    • engagement
    • environment
    • environmental assessment
    • environmental justice
    • ethnoracial
    • food security
    • government
    • green
    • health
    • implementation
    • infrastructure
    • internet
    • management
    • marketing
    • media
    • minorities
    • multimedia
    • municipalities
    • municipality
    • nuclear
    • peer review
    • planning
    • policy
    • politics
    • population
    • Portlands Energy Centre
    • project management
    • public
    • public consultation
    • public engagement
    • regions
    • resiliency
    • review
    • risk management
    • Rotary
    • social media
    • social responsibility
    • social science
    • socio-economic
    • socio-economic impact assessment
    • stakeholders
    • strategic planning
    • strategic plannning
    • sustainability
    • technology
    • Toronto
    • towns
    • transportation
    • twitter
    • Twitter tips for municipal government
    • urban planning
    • video
    • waste
    • waste management
    • water
    • well-being
    • zoning
  • Follow Us on Twitter

    • Hmm. City of Toronto needs work to get a passing grade. If you are interested in municipal budgeting and transpar… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 7 hours ago
    • RT @OntarioPlanners: @HardyStevenson is hiring a Manager - Communications, Engagement & Facilitation. Apply by February 15, 2019. For job d… 1 week ago
    • @OntarioPlanners Thanks for the Tweet! 2 weeks ago
    • @ontariovoter888 @newsuburbanism Hi Chris. Yes it is. However, we are first trying to get the City of Toronto on… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 weeks ago
    • RT @DinnerandaSong: Feb 15 Mike McKeena @StoneCottagePub 50th anniversary of Stink album @CBCBigCity @TOBluesSociety @RandysVinylTap @Hardy… 3 weeks ago
  • Top Posts & Pages

    • Community Well-being – What is it and What Does it Mean for Projects and Local Communities?
    • How to Work with Multiple Stakeholder Groups
    • What is a Professional Peer Review?
    • RSS - Posts
    • RSS - Comments
  • Advertisements
  • Commenting Guidelines

    Please note Hardy Stevenson and Associates Limited encourages readers to post comments and links on the HSAL blog, and supports sharing and discussion. However, posts that include promotion of commercial goods, inappropriate language and/or content including but not limited to nudity, personal attacks, foul language, unsubstantiated claims of fact and off-topic posts will be removed by the administrators without notice.
  • Archives

    • January 2017
    • July 2016
    • April 2015
    • November 2014
    • July 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • November 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • July 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • May 2011
  • Categories

    • Communications
    • Communities
    • Consultation
    • Energy
    • Management
    • New Media
    • Planning
    • Politics
    • Socio-Economic Impact Analysis
    • Sustainability
    • Transportation
    • Uncategorized
    • Waste Management
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.com
Hardy Stevenson Insights
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: